<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for PC Hospital	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://pchospital-uk.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://pchospital-uk.com</link>
	<description>Fast and Professional Same Day Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2023 11:59:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Substantial scientifically derived computer data supporting Creation theory by admin		</title>
		<link>https://pchospital-uk.com/substantial-scientifically-derived-computer-data-supporting-creation-theory/#comment-5123</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 12:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pchospitalonline.co.uk/?p=636#comment-5123</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://pchospital-uk.com/substantial-scientifically-derived-computer-data-supporting-creation-theory/#comment-4967&quot;&gt;Lydia&lt;/a&gt;.

Well Lydia all I can offer you is evidence on this link, all the white papers and sources are here, it will not take you very long to realise we are living in a engineered environment. Hope this helps. https://reasons.org/explore/publications/articles/rtb-design-compendium-2009]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://pchospital-uk.com/substantial-scientifically-derived-computer-data-supporting-creation-theory/#comment-4967">Lydia</a>.</p>
<p>Well Lydia all I can offer you is evidence on this link, all the white papers and sources are here, it will not take you very long to realise we are living in a engineered environment. Hope this helps. <a href="https://reasons.org/explore/publications/articles/rtb-design-compendium-2009" rel="nofollow ugc">https://reasons.org/explore/publications/articles/rtb-design-compendium-2009</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Substantial scientifically derived computer data supporting Creation theory by admin		</title>
		<link>https://pchospital-uk.com/substantial-scientifically-derived-computer-data-supporting-creation-theory/#comment-5122</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 12:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pchospitalonline.co.uk/?p=636#comment-5122</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://pchospital-uk.com/substantial-scientifically-derived-computer-data-supporting-creation-theory/#comment-5092&quot;&gt;Ash&lt;/a&gt;.

Unfortunately Ash the evolution theory completely violates the Entropy laws and I can think of many more violations of known science principles. Are you asking us to throw the science out the window? You will find the full list of supporting white papers and sources on this link. https://reasons.org/explore/publications/articles/rtb-design-compendium-2009]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://pchospital-uk.com/substantial-scientifically-derived-computer-data-supporting-creation-theory/#comment-5092">Ash</a>.</p>
<p>Unfortunately Ash the evolution theory completely violates the Entropy laws and I can think of many more violations of known science principles. Are you asking us to throw the science out the window? You will find the full list of supporting white papers and sources on this link. <a href="https://reasons.org/explore/publications/articles/rtb-design-compendium-2009" rel="nofollow ugc">https://reasons.org/explore/publications/articles/rtb-design-compendium-2009</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Substantial scientifically derived computer data supporting Creation theory by admin		</title>
		<link>https://pchospital-uk.com/substantial-scientifically-derived-computer-data-supporting-creation-theory/#comment-5121</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 11:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pchospitalonline.co.uk/?p=636#comment-5121</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://pchospital-uk.com/substantial-scientifically-derived-computer-data-supporting-creation-theory/#comment-4847&quot;&gt;geeno&lt;/a&gt;.

Unfortunately everything in this post is proven by modern science. This stuff is not up for debate. The fine tuning in the universe is proven , below is a link to all the white papers and sources. https://reasons.org/explore/publications/articles/rtb-design-compendium-2009]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://pchospital-uk.com/substantial-scientifically-derived-computer-data-supporting-creation-theory/#comment-4847">geeno</a>.</p>
<p>Unfortunately everything in this post is proven by modern science. This stuff is not up for debate. The fine tuning in the universe is proven , below is a link to all the white papers and sources. <a href="https://reasons.org/explore/publications/articles/rtb-design-compendium-2009" rel="nofollow ugc">https://reasons.org/explore/publications/articles/rtb-design-compendium-2009</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Substantial scientifically derived computer data supporting Creation theory by admin		</title>
		<link>https://pchospital-uk.com/substantial-scientifically-derived-computer-data-supporting-creation-theory/#comment-5120</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 11:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pchospitalonline.co.uk/?p=636#comment-5120</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://pchospital-uk.com/substantial-scientifically-derived-computer-data-supporting-creation-theory/#comment-5013&quot;&gt;Rosalind&lt;/a&gt;.

Absolutely the reason why I put together this post together, we already have limitless scientific evidence of a Grand Creator at work through fine tuning, but this information seems to be being suppressed from the public. Your comment is very encouraging Rosalind.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://pchospital-uk.com/substantial-scientifically-derived-computer-data-supporting-creation-theory/#comment-5013">Rosalind</a>.</p>
<p>Absolutely the reason why I put together this post together, we already have limitless scientific evidence of a Grand Creator at work through fine tuning, but this information seems to be being suppressed from the public. Your comment is very encouraging Rosalind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Substantial scientifically derived computer data supporting Creation theory by Ash		</title>
		<link>https://pchospital-uk.com/substantial-scientifically-derived-computer-data-supporting-creation-theory/#comment-5092</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2022 07:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pchospitalonline.co.uk/?p=636#comment-5092</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://pchospital-uk.com/substantial-scientifically-derived-computer-data-supporting-creation-theory/#comment-5013&quot;&gt;Rosalind&lt;/a&gt;.

Evolution is still the strongest theory we have when it comes to science and our knowledge of the universe, we hardly know anything and that&#039;s okay not to know the answers. But one thing we are certain of is the bible is a book of stories written by humans for humans, it&#039;s purely fiction and has no place in a serious scientific debate.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://pchospital-uk.com/substantial-scientifically-derived-computer-data-supporting-creation-theory/#comment-5013">Rosalind</a>.</p>
<p>Evolution is still the strongest theory we have when it comes to science and our knowledge of the universe, we hardly know anything and that&#8217;s okay not to know the answers. But one thing we are certain of is the bible is a book of stories written by humans for humans, it&#8217;s purely fiction and has no place in a serious scientific debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Substantial scientifically derived computer data supporting Creation theory by Roger		</title>
		<link>https://pchospital-uk.com/substantial-scientifically-derived-computer-data-supporting-creation-theory/#comment-5020</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2022 15:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pchospitalonline.co.uk/?p=636#comment-5020</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree totally with you, yes tjere are mathematics in the universe but that does not mean that a vengeful and rage full God created them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree totally with you, yes tjere are mathematics in the universe but that does not mean that a vengeful and rage full God created them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Substantial scientifically derived computer data supporting Creation theory by Rosalind		</title>
		<link>https://pchospital-uk.com/substantial-scientifically-derived-computer-data-supporting-creation-theory/#comment-5013</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosalind]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2022 10:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pchospitalonline.co.uk/?p=636#comment-5013</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you so much for this. I needed it. Through talking to my friend who is a Christian I was starting to believe but still had many doubts. This article and videos broke those last barriers away. I’ve still got so much to learn and a long way to go but this article has been a bit of a breakthrough for me. :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for this. I needed it. Through talking to my friend who is a Christian I was starting to believe but still had many doubts. This article and videos broke those last barriers away. I’ve still got so much to learn and a long way to go but this article has been a bit of a breakthrough for me. 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Substantial scientifically derived computer data supporting Creation theory by admin		</title>
		<link>https://pchospital-uk.com/substantial-scientifically-derived-computer-data-supporting-creation-theory/#comment-5000</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2022 00:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pchospitalonline.co.uk/?p=636#comment-5000</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://pchospital-uk.com/substantial-scientifically-derived-computer-data-supporting-creation-theory/#comment-4992&quot;&gt;Seoras Donnchadh&lt;/a&gt;.

I was the same Seoras, I instinctively new from my youth that I was living in an environment that seemed to be designed for mankind.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://pchospital-uk.com/substantial-scientifically-derived-computer-data-supporting-creation-theory/#comment-4992">Seoras Donnchadh</a>.</p>
<p>I was the same Seoras, I instinctively new from my youth that I was living in an environment that seemed to be designed for mankind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Substantial scientifically derived computer data supporting Creation theory by admin		</title>
		<link>https://pchospital-uk.com/substantial-scientifically-derived-computer-data-supporting-creation-theory/#comment-4999</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 23:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pchospitalonline.co.uk/?p=636#comment-4999</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://pchospital-uk.com/substantial-scientifically-derived-computer-data-supporting-creation-theory/#comment-4847&quot;&gt;geeno&lt;/a&gt;.

Look I am happy enough that you took the time to read and listen to the 7 videos accompanying the article but from your abrupt response I am unsure if you are focusing on the actual proven science they are trying to convey. As it stands those are the facts, they can’t be disputed. One of the common questions I get is,  
What are the 4 main points of Darwin&#039;s theory of evolution?
The four key points of Darwin&#039;s Theory of Evolution are: individuals of a species are not identical; traits are passed from generation to generation; more offspring are born than can survive; and only the survivors of the competition for resources will reproduce.
 
However before we can even entertain the 4 key points we need to address the very basics. How do we get from a collection of molecules to biological life without the guidance of a Creative Godhead leading the process as One.
 
I would humbly ask you to go back to the video interview of Professor James Tour (Rice University ) (PHD) named “The Origin of Life has not been explained ” . As the foremost expert in synthetic organic chemistry. Prebiotic (chemistry), inorganic or organic chemistry in the natural environment before the advent of life on Earth.
 
This position makes him the ideal person to criticise Origin of Life theories such as evolution. Firstly his organisation has been trying to assemble 40k Lipids, proteins, carbohydrates in many experiments in laboratory conditions. With a view to create life from pre-biotic molecules. And there have been many more scientists before him trying to do the same. The result is always the same, life is very complicated and the  mathematics behind the processes involved can only be considered mind boggling. For example the interactome is the whole set of molecular interactions in a single yeast cell, has 10&lt;sup&gt;79&lt;/sup&gt; BILLION permutations. Yes I said BILLION so that’s a 1 with 79 billion 0 behind it. To put that in perspective the total particles in the known universe is considerably less at 10&lt;sup&gt;90&lt;/sup&gt; So that’s a 1 with 90 zeros only [NOT BILLION]. So expecting life to spontaneously come into existence from within a pond or from under a rock is highly improbable. Can you watch the video again please. https://youtu.be/r4sP1E1Jd_Y]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://pchospital-uk.com/substantial-scientifically-derived-computer-data-supporting-creation-theory/#comment-4847">geeno</a>.</p>
<p>Look I am happy enough that you took the time to read and listen to the 7 videos accompanying the article but from your abrupt response I am unsure if you are focusing on the actual proven science they are trying to convey. As it stands those are the facts, they can’t be disputed. One of the common questions I get is,<br />
What are the 4 main points of Darwin&#8217;s theory of evolution?<br />
The four key points of Darwin&#8217;s Theory of Evolution are: individuals of a species are not identical; traits are passed from generation to generation; more offspring are born than can survive; and only the survivors of the competition for resources will reproduce.</p>
<p>However before we can even entertain the 4 key points we need to address the very basics. How do we get from a collection of molecules to biological life without the guidance of a Creative Godhead leading the process as One.</p>
<p>I would humbly ask you to go back to the video interview of Professor James Tour (Rice University ) (PHD) named “The Origin of Life has not been explained ” . As the foremost expert in synthetic organic chemistry. Prebiotic (chemistry), inorganic or organic chemistry in the natural environment before the advent of life on Earth.</p>
<p>This position makes him the ideal person to criticise Origin of Life theories such as evolution. Firstly his organisation has been trying to assemble 40k Lipids, proteins, carbohydrates in many experiments in laboratory conditions. With a view to create life from pre-biotic molecules. And there have been many more scientists before him trying to do the same. The result is always the same, life is very complicated and the  mathematics behind the processes involved can only be considered mind boggling. For example the interactome is the whole set of molecular interactions in a single yeast cell, has 10<sup>79</sup> BILLION permutations. Yes I said BILLION so that’s a 1 with 79 billion 0 behind it. To put that in perspective the total particles in the known universe is considerably less at 10<sup>90</sup> So that’s a 1 with 90 zeros only [NOT BILLION]. So expecting life to spontaneously come into existence from within a pond or from under a rock is highly improbable. Can you watch the video again please. <a href="https://youtu.be/r4sP1E1Jd_Y" rel="nofollow ugc">https://youtu.be/r4sP1E1Jd_Y</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Substantial scientifically derived computer data supporting Creation theory by Seoras Donnchadh		</title>
		<link>https://pchospital-uk.com/substantial-scientifically-derived-computer-data-supporting-creation-theory/#comment-4992</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seoras Donnchadh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2022 12:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pchospitalonline.co.uk/?p=636#comment-4992</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I never truly believed in evolution at any time]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never truly believed in evolution at any time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
