Substantial scientifically derived computer data supporting Creation theory


As scientist gather more computer data faster then in any other time in history the overall conclusion is that there is intelligent design in every aspect of this reality called life on Earth.

Despite the overwhelming computer data mankind has gathered and the discovery of DNA in every living cell. I am astonished at the huge number of individuals who still cling to the concept or theory of evolution as seen in the above video produced by living Waters and the Evangelist Ray  comfort. As you can see in the video even when confronted with the Dynamics of a DNA molecule which in simplified terms is in fact a blueprint for life surrounded by it’s own logistic infrastructure and communications system. Beside the DNA molecule is a state of the art factory which will produce proteins from the amino acids which will then go on to produce cells tissues organs and finally the organism the DNA molecule is attempting to build or repair. the complexity of the DNA molecule is so far advanced than anything man has ever created, far more advanced than the international space station or the Hadron collider (CERN) in Switzerland. Mmmm how did a complex biological precise computer program get into every living cell ! And as you can plainly see in the video we have individuals thinly grasping onto the notion of Evolution that from “nothing” everything was created.

So I, and others are extremely disappointed when we see that evolution appears to be gaining ground due to the educational system. Therefore blinding and stifling our own children and young adults. They have been sold an evolution narrative that could only be considered Impossible by any measure of the word. Analysts and scientists who fully understand the impossibility of evolution due to the data that they are exposed to and have themselves gathered are reluctant to make an issue of the fact through fear of losing their jobs or reputation. On this page are videos and links to resources that support what I’m saying but let me give you a few example’s. The Sciences  has many subcategories one of them is called computer modelling, whereby we are able to input data into a complex computer system and have the computer churns through a number of possibilities at an exponential rate giving us the results much faster than would be expected.

Now I would like to include some excerpts from a white paper written by Henry Morris called “The mathematical impossibility of evolution. But before we jump to the results here is an excerpt which describes the process of evolution “ According to the most-widely accepted theory of evolution today, the sole mechanism for producing evolution is that of random mutation combined with natural selection. Mutations are random changes in genetic systems. Natural selection is considered by evolutionists to be a sort of sieve, which retains the “good” mutations and allows the others to pass away. Since random changes in ordered systems almost always will decrease the amount of order in those systems, nearly all mutations are harmful to the organisms which experience them. Nevertheless, the evolutionist insists that each complex organism in the world today has arisen by a long string of gradually accumulated good mutations preserved by natural selection.”

A computer modelling expert is able to take that statement and turn it into mathematical data that the computer can work with and exponentially produce results that will determine the probability and likelihood of such a theory been possible on Earth. They’re have been many of these experiments  all producing very un-supportive results or at best a planet covered in nothing but green algae even after 4 billion years. And even in that modelling result, you were given a planet that could support life in the first place. But going back to my point, check out some of the results from the white paper “the successful production of a 200-component functioning organism requires, at least, 200 successive, successful such “mutations,” each of which is highly unlikely. Even evolutionists recognize that true mutations are very rare, and beneficial mutations are extremely rare—not more than one out of a thousand mutations are beneficial, at the very most. But let us give the evolutionist the benefit of every consideration. Assume that, at each mutational step, there is equally as much chance for it to be good as bad. Thus, the probability for the success of each mutation is assumed to be one out of two, or one-half. Elementary statistical theory shows that the probability of 200 successive mutations being successful is then (½)200, or one chance out of 10(60). The number 10(60), if written out, would be “one” followed by sixty “zeros.” In other words, the chance that a 200-component organism could be formed by mutation and natural selection is less than one chance out of a trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion! Lest anyone think that a 200-part system is unreasonably complex, it should be noted that even a one-celled plant or animal may have millions of molecular (parts)”

Just to bring that into perspective there are estimated to be 10(86) Hydrogen atoms in the observable universe. And just to make sure that no individual can be comfortable with that number I will write it out the expression in full 10(60) so that’s 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 TO 1 chance of evolving a 200 component organism. It’s a big number right ? Clearly anyone believing in this  theory is on the wrong path and should be warned.


Proving God Using Only Science and Common Sense

What is DNA and how does it work?

Estimated number of known atoms.

Astronomy Reveals 6000 year old Earth

Data derived analysis proves the accuracy of the Bible and it’s prophecies.